Thermal Master P4: 30-second review

The Thermal Master P4 is the latest addition to the brand's P-series of smartphone thermal cameras, and technically, it eclipses the previous P3 design. Rather than offering a single thermal sensor, it pairs the now-familiar 256x192 VOx microbolometer with a visible light camera, creating a dual-lens design. Thermal Master calls the world's first of its kind in this class, ignoring all the phones with thermal cameras that already have this capability.

That combination unlocks four imaging modes. Users can switch between standard infrared, visible light, IR-Fuse (a blended overlay), and MIX mode, which fuses both streams in real time.

We’ve seen this work extremely well on phones that support the same approach. And the only issue is often that, because each sensor sees a slightly different angle, the two images sometimes don’t align well. This is especially true when working close up.

To address this on the P4, Thermal Master introduced the IR Eraser function that allows rapid toggling between thermal and optical views, which is useful for aligning what you are seeing thermally with the physical layout of the object in front of you.

What the P4 doesn’t deliver is a new thermal sensor. Therefore, it has the same resolution as the P3, with native 256x192 capture enhanced to 512x384 through the X3IR software algorithm. Sensitivity is rated at under 35 mK, and there are 15 professional measurement modes, including point, line, rectangle, and circle tracking. The temperature range runs from minus 20 degrees Celsius to 600 degrees Celsius, with an accuracy of plus or minus 2 degrees Celsius.

There is, however, a significant caveat. The P4 is Android only. There is no iOS version, and Thermal Master makes no suggestion that one is planned. For iPhone users, the P3 or P1 cameras remain the only choices from this brand. It can be used with a PC, though it requires a way to hold the camera, since Thermal Master doesn’t include a tripod or stand.

Overall, for those who work on heating/cooling installations, engines, or power distribution systems, the P4 could be a remarkably useful tool. But its lack of a macro capability makes it unsuitable for electronics repair.

Thermal Master P4: price and availability

• How much does it cost? $400/£360/€400
• When is it out? It is available now
• Where can you get it? Direct from the Thermal Master website, with shipping from regional warehouses in the US, UK, EU, and China. And via online retailers.

The P4 carries a standard price of $499 USD, though at the time of writing, Thermal Master was running a sale that reduced the cost to $399 USD.

Direct from Thermal Master, UK buyers pay £359, which seems a little excessive at current exchange rates compared to the dollar price. European buyers pay €399, which, given that the Euro is stronger than the Dollar, is disappointing.

It is worth noting that Thermal Master states that all listed prices include applicable import duties and taxes for supported regions, thereby removing the risk of unexpected fees at delivery.

Those expecting to find it cheaper on Amazon.com will be disappointed, since it’s the same cost as from Thermal Master. And, the same is true on Amazon.co.uk.

By comparison, the Thermal Master P3 retails at $279 USD (sale from $349 USD), making the P4 a notable step up in price. The FLIR One Pro sits at around $429 USD, so the P4 is in competitive territory. For European buyers, the TOPDON TC001 at roughly $209 USD offers a lower-cost alternative, though it lacks the dual-lens feature set.

Given that this is the same thermal sensor, adding a low specification conventional sensor and charging an additional $120 over the P3 makes the P4 something of a gouge.

• Value score: 3.5/5

Thermal Master P4: Specs

Thermal Master P4: Design

• Ultra compact
• Extension cable included, but no tripod
• Dual-lens layout with infrared and visible light sensors
• No iOS support

Before we get into the weeds of what makes the P4 a truly desirable thermal camera, I need to call out how lovely the engineering of this tiny 26,5g camera is.

It’s an all-metal construction that apes a compact camera layout, with a USB port protruding from its top. Therefore, it's clearly designed to be inserted into a phone's USB port and operated entirely via software. That’s good, because buttons on the camera would have introduced forces that would translate through to the USB port unfavourably.

Thermal Master includes a 50cm USB-C extension cable, which makes good sense since getting the camera away from the phone body improves the view, and some rugged designs block attachment with rubber plugs. However, as was an issue previously with the P1 and P3, how are you meant to direct the camera, hold the phone, and operate the software unless you have three hands?

I’m not sure, but amazingly, after an outlay of $400, there is still no tripod or stand in the box. Holding the extension cable with the camera dangling at one end while operating the app with the other hand remains an awkward arrangement at best, and I’m rapidly losing patience with the idea that Thermal Master will ever notice this issue.

What is good about this design is that the thermal and visible light sensor centres are only about 10cm apart, reducing the parallax effect between the images. But the camera doesn’t come with a lens cap to prevent debris from getting on either sensor.

The last point is critical and, thankfully, isn’t an issue for this reviewer: the lack of support for Apple iOS. There are no adapters to plug the P4 into an iPhone, unless it has a USB-C port, and the software to use it is not on the Apple App Store.

It may be that this might be addressed by an Apple version in the fullness of time, but it's rumoured that Apple will do away with ports altogether (to avoid being told by the EU to add them) and charge wirelessly, which would scupper Thermal Master and a significant selection of hardware addon companies.

It’s worth noting that the camera can also be used with a PC if it has a USB-C port.

Overall, the construction quality is high, and with dual sensors, it has the credentials to be the best Thermal Master phone accessory. However, the inability of Thermal Master to deliver on both Android and Apple platforms, and the lack of a tripod, serve to undermine this proposition and the relatively high asking price.

Design score: 3.5/5

Thermal Master P4: User experience

• Android 6.0 or above required, no iOS version
• 4 imaging and 15 temperature modes

A key limitation of the P4 is the Android-only compatibility. Thermal Master offers no iOS version of the P4, and no Lightning or USB-C to Lightning adapter is included. iPhone users must look elsewhere in their range.

The Temp Master app is the same software used across the P-series. On the positive side, this means 15 measurement modes, 12 colour palettes, temperature alarm functions, and time-lapse recording are all present.

But the central selling point of the P4 is the dual-lens arrangement, and that brings the MIX mode that combines data from both the thermal and optical sensors. This works brilliantly in most respects, and better than I’ve ever seen it work on phones with thermal sensors.

However, the positioning of the two image sources isn’t always ideal, and that’s not due to the sensors being slightly offset. It’s because the phone is handheld, and the thermal image's refresh rate is much lower than that of a conventional light sensor. Therefore, the conventional light data is always ahead of the thermal, something that wouldn’t be an issue if the phone (or camera) were on a tripod or other support.

This is especially evident when you use the IR Eraser function, a mode that lets you rub on the image with a finger to reveal the live image source beneath. This is a useful mode, but due to the lag of the thermal component, the window is often slightly out of fit with the thermal.

The IR-Fuse mode blends both streams into a single image where the conventional image source takes priority. And, if you want, there is a purely thermal mode. But using that would entirely undermine buying the P4, since you could get the same experience on the P3 for less.

For general HVAC and building inspection work, the dual-lens feature genuinely adds something. Identifying a damp patch or a failing insulation section is clearer when you can overlay the thermal reading onto a visible light reference. But for PCB work, the P3 with its macro lens and manual focus is still likely the better choice.

I’m inclined to believe that not providing a macro mode was a tactical choice by Thermal Master, since the P3 probably still sells well. Having the P4 come along and cannibalise P3 sales wouldn’t be a smart move.

I suspect, at some point in the future, when the P3 and P4 are end-of-line, a new P5 will appear that offers both the dual sensor capability and a macro mode, but that’s a guess.

The free PC analysis software is a genuine bonus at this price. It supports 2D and 3D thermal editing, report generation, and works with both offline image files and live connections.

If you detect a slight frustration here, it's that this camera has the ability to create some of the best thermal imagery I’ve seen at this price point, but the lack of any way to lock the camera physically or a macro mode, stops it from being the best choice for all thermal requirements.

The P4 is easily better than any thermal camera I’ve seen on a phone, although it costs more than the price of one of those, and you still have to provide the phone.

• User experience score: 3.5/5

Thermal Master P4 Camera samples

Thermal Master P4: Final verdict

If it weren’t for some obvious issues where the phone or camera should be kept stationary, I might argue that it's worth the extra cost over the P3 for the improved quality of the results. But the P3 had a macro mode that made it useful for those hunting circuit board component issues.

That reduces the potential areas where it can be useful, even if it still leaves plenty of jobs it can do, but at this price, customers will want it all. Something else it appears Thermal Master seems disinclined to offer is compatibility with Apple iOS devices. The P3 supported Apple iOS customers from the outset, so perhaps it's not coming for the P4?

These issues, and the high cost, take some of the shine off what could have been an entirely positive review. For those who don’t use Apple-branded equipment and aren’t bothered by the price or lack of a macro mode, this is a great choice and a notch up from previous devices.

Should I buy a Thermal Master P4?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also Consider

DJI Lito X1 and Lito 1: One-minute review

DJI's Lito series represents the company's latest bid to own the entry-level camera drone market — and with the Lito X1 and the more affordable Lito 1, it's made a compelling case. Both are compact folding drones in the same pocket-friendly mould as DJI's Mini series, weighing under 250g and earning a C0/UK0 class designation that means you can fly them almost anywhere, including over people.

Out in the field, the Lito models impress on almost every front. Flight performance is smooth and stable; I flew in challenging coastal conditions in the UK and the drones held their own, and despite an 81dB noise rating, both models are surprisingly unobtrusive in the air.

Battery life is a high point too, with up to 36 minutes on a charge comfortably outpacing DJI's Neo 2 and other entry-level rivals. What really sets the Lito apart at this price, though, is its obstacle sensing: full omnidirectional coverage comes as standard on both models, while the X1 adds forward-facing LiDAR for even sharper hazard detection — a significant upgrade over the downward-only sensor on the DJI Mini 4K.

On the camera front, both drones punch above their weight. The Lito X1's 1/1.3-inch sensor captures 10-bit 4K 60fps footage with D-Log M support and 14 stops of dynamic range, giving videographers real room to work in post. The Lito 1's 1/2-inch sensor is no slouch either, though it lacks that dynamic range, and isn't as comfortable in lower-light situations.

I'd recommend most buyers stretch to the X1; the small premium over the Lito 1 also gets you LiDAR, 10-bit shooting and 42GB of built-in storage, which is a lot of extras for a modest price jump. Neither drone is perfect: the digital zoom gets noticeably soft at its tightest setting, the X1 has a default tendency to overexpose, and neither camera can rotate to shoot vertical video natively.

At £299 / AU$539 for the Lito 1 and £369 / AU$619 for the Lito X1, DJI has priced this series aggressively. The X1 in particular offers a spec sheet that rivals far pricier drones, making it one of the best-value camera drones available right now. US buyers should note that, like other recent DJI products, the Lito series isn't officially available stateside and can only be sourced through grey market channels. For everyone else, it's an easy recommendation from me.

DJI Lito X1 and Lito 1: Price and release date

• Launched on April 23 2026
• Lito 1 priced from £299 / AU$539, Lito X1 from £369 / AU$619
• Fly More Combo bundles available for both drones

The Lito series was introduced worldwide on April 23 2026, and is available to order now from DJI's website and other retailers – except in the United States where, as with all recent DJI products, there are no plans to bring it to retailers (although buyers may be able to acquire it through certain retailers on the grey market).

As mentioned above, there are two models available at launch: the barebones Lito 1, and the more premium Lito X1. These are priced at £299 / AU$539 and £369 / AU$619 respectively, and are also available in Fly More Combos for £429 / AU$779 and £599 / AU$1,069. The Lito 1 Fly More Combo comes with two additional batteries, a three-battery charging cradle, an RC-N3 controller, and a carrying bag; the Lito X1 features the same, but swaps the RC-N3 controller for the touchscreen-equipped RC 2 model.

The Litos are slotting in right at the bottom of DJI's drone range, alongside models like the Mini 4K, Neo 2 and Flip. In fact, I suspect the Mini 4K is about to be phased out in favor of the Lito, as the Lito is superior in every major respect, but the Neo 2 and Flip will remain, as they offer something a little different.

Is the Lito good value? Yes, in short — it's the same price as the Flip and more expensive than the Neo 2, but offers better battery life than both (significantly so, compared to the Neo 2) and better obstacle sensing than the Flip. In fact, the Lito X1 offers similar specs to the Mini 4 Pro (another drone that I believe may be on the way out of DJI's lineup) at a significantly lower price.

• Price score: 5/5

DJI Lito X1 and DJI Lito: Specs

DJI Lito X1: Design and build quality

• Folding sub-250g body, similar to Mini series
• Labelled UK0 / C0 class
• 42GB of internal storage (X1 model only) plus microSD slot

The Lito X1 and Lito 1 are virtually identical in design, with the only real physical difference being a (very) slight variation in the color of their plastic bodies. If not for that, and the product name displayed on their prop arms, the two drones would be impossible to tell apart.

The folding design is reminiscent of DJI's Mini series, and like those drones, the Lito weighs under 250g. As a result it's classed C0 in Europe and UK0 in the United Kingdom, meaning it can be flown almost anywhere, as well as close to and above "uninvolved" people. Additionally, the Lito's folding design means it's one of the few drones out there that I could genuinely say is pocket-sized – although we're talking trenchcoat pocket rather than jeans pocket here.

As with most of its drones, DJI supplies the Lito with a plastic cap to protect the camera and gimbal when they're not in use, but no carry case by default — you'll have to upgrade to the Fly More Combo if you want a bag.

In general, the drone is well built, despite its weight. The plastic used for the body is sturdy, with built-in feet/landing gear to prevent the sensors getting damaged when it's sitting on a surface; the propellers, however, are largely unprotected, so some care is required when handling.

The battery slides in and out from the back, which is also where you'll find the USB-C port and microSD slot. The USB port can be used for charging and data transfer, while the microSD slot supports storage. The Lito X1 also includes 42GB of built-in storage space, which can be supplemented with microSD if required, but you'll need a microSD card for the Lito 1.

The RC 2 and RC-N3 controllers supplied with the Lito are tried and tested models that we've covered in previous DJI drone reviews. Suffice to say they're solidly built and comfortable in the hand, and the RC 2 has a very impressive built-in touchscreen.

• Design score: 5/5

DJI Lito X1: Features and flight performance

• QuickTransfer uses Wi-Fi 6 to move files quickly to a mobile device
• Both Lito 1 and Lito X1 offer omnidirectional obstacle avoidance, plus LiDAR on Lito X1
• Up to 36 minutes of flight time per battery

• Flight performance score: 5/5

DJI Lito X1: Image and video quality

• Lito X1 has 1/1.3-inch sensor, while Lito 1 has 1/2-inch sensor
• Lito X1 supports 10-bit video and D-log M color profile
• Both drones shoot JPEG and DNG photos at 12MP and 48MP

Most of DJI's drones now record 4K video — even the bargain-basement original DJI Neo — but the Lito X1 and Lito 1 offer a better flavor of 4K than the existing entry-level Mini 4K model's 4K 30fps footage, captured from a 1/2.3-inch sensor. The Lito 1 records 8-bit 4K 60fps video from a slightly larger 1/2-inch sensor (presumably the same one that's in the DJI Neo 2), while the Lito X1 records 10-bit 4K 60fps video using a 1/1.3-inch sensor (which I suspect is the same as the one in the DJI Flip, Mini 4 Pro and Avata 2). Both use a 3-axis gimbal to steady the camera as they shoot.

The Lito X1 also supports the flat D-log M color profile, offering a dynamic range of up to 14 stops when graded in post-production — something that's sure to appeal to demanding aerial videographers who enjoy tweaking their own footage to perfection. You can see both straight-from-the-camera and graded footage in my sample video above, and further down there's another video showcasing the Lito 1's camera which, while certainly a step down from the X1's, is no slouch itself, especially in good lighting.

I'm impressed with the results from both cameras, both video and 12MP/48MP stills (which can be captured in raw DNG as well as JPEG); the Lito X1 is especially noteworthy.

That being said, these are still entry-level models, and they can't match results from the likes of the DJI Mini 5 Pro or Air 3S. This is especially true when you attempt to 'zoom' in, which is where the sensors' small sizes shows their limitations. You can see examples in my videos, but the digital zooms on both Litos are somewhat disappointing. I also felt that the X1 had a tendency to overexpose its video by default, but even if this isn't tweaked in a future firmware update it's something the user can fix by adjusting the EV.

Overall, it's fair to say that the cameras on the Lito X1 and Lito 1 are really solid by entry-level standards, and a step up over what we've seen on the Mini 4K.

• Image and video quality score: 4.5/5

DJI Lito X1: Testing scorecard

Should I buy the DJI Lito X1/Lito 1?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

DJI Lito X1: also consider

How I tested the DJI Lito X1 and Lito 1

• I tested all flight modes and control methods
• I captured both videos and photos
• I tested the drones' tracking and safety features

About a week before the official launch, DJI sent me both the Lito X1 Fly More Combo and the basic Lito 1 package (including the RC-N3 controller) to test. That gave me a few days to take both drones out and about for real-world flight and camera tests in a range of conditions.

I flew in both windy and calm weather, and was able to test the two drones' cameras in low-light conditions. I tested not only manual flight, but autonomous modes like Spotlight, ActiveTrack and MasterShots, as well as assessing how DJI's battery-life and object-avoidance claims held up to real-world conditions.

After flying, I edited together the videos you see above using DaVinci Resolve 20, including using LUTs and color correction for the D-log M footage I captured with the Lito X1. I also tweaked the DNG raw still photographs I took with both drones using Adobe Lightroom.

• First reviewed: April 2026
• Read more about how we test

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: One-minute review

I've been around the content creator's block enough times to say that the DJI Osmo Pocket 3 is easily the most popular vlogging camera for creators on the go. I've seen the tiny, gimbal-stabilized 4K camera in the hands of so many people, and with good reason — it's a fabulously discreet and powerful pocket video camera.

Ahead of what could be a stampede of new rivals, not least of which could be the rumored Insta360 Luna, DJI now looks to build on the success of its two-and-a-bit-year-old vlogging camera with a new and improved successor, the Osmo Pocket 4.

Considering the time between the two cameras, and how swift DJI has been in bringing genuine improvements to its camera gear in recent years, especially its drones such as the Mini 5 Pro, I expected a little more from the Pocket 4. That being said, there are a few notable upgrades worth knowing about — I've unpacked those in more detail in this Pocket 4 vs Pocket 3 article.

All the bits I appreciate about the Pocket 3 remain — the compact design, stellar video stabilization performance, crisp 4K video, the easy switch between vertical and horizontal video, and direct connection with wireless mics.

What DJI has done in the Pocket 4 is add some welcome polish. The new features might not leap out on a spec sheet, but in real use they combine for a slicker user experience.

Top upgrades include better slow-motion recording, now up to 240fps in 4K, better-quality 4K video with 10-bit color depth and wider dynamic range now up to 14 stops, slicker subject tracking which is available in more modes, better battery life, 107GB of internal memory, and refined controls, such as a new magnetic gimbal arm which accepts accessories such as a fill light (see the hero image).

It's not a big upgrade per se, but it's enough of an improvement that I would recommend Pocket 3 owners take a look, and it's an easy recommendation for first-time buyers looking for a powerful and small vlogging camera besides their smartphone.

DJI has tightened its stranglehold on this pocket video camera market, but for how long? When Insta360 enters the stage, it might just wrestle the spotlight away from this playing-it-safe Pocket 4 upgrade.

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: price and release date

• Announced on April 16 2026
• Available in Essential, Standard and Creator Combo kits
• Prices start at £429 / AU$749, with US availability and pricing TBC

The DJI Osmo Pocket 4 was unveiled on April 16 2026 in Essential, Standard and Creator Combo packages. The Essential Combo costs £429 / AU$749, the Standard Combo is £445 / AU$769 and comes with the gimbal clamp and tripod handle, while the Creator Combo, which adds Mic 3 transmitter, wide-angle lens, magnetic fill light, mini tripod, and carry bag accessories, costs £549 / AU$959, and is better value for DJI newcomers.

There's no US pricing or availability at launch through official DJI channels, given DJI's ongoing issues in the US. Like most DJI products, the Osmo Pocket 4 is excellent value considering what it's capable of, and it'll be a tough ask for future rivals to beat it.

• Price score: 4.5/5

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: specs

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: Design

• Similar pocket-size dimensions to the Pocket 3, with rotating screen and gimbal-mounted camera
• USB-C fast charging and a handy 107GB of internal storage in addition to micro SD
• New controls added, and smarter joystick response

The Pocket 4 has a familiar look about it, because it keeps a similar Pocket 3 form factor that has won many admirers, even if it is a tiny bit taller.

I can't stress enough how important its compact dimensions are for vlogging on the go. The Pocket 4 is even more discreet for video than a phone, and in my experience I've never had anyone take issue with me filming in public with an Osmo Pocket. Put simply, you can film freely with one of these.

At first glance you might think there's nothing new in this latest model, but there are in fact some helpful design tweaks. For instance, the speed of the gimbal's movement responds to how firmly you push the joystick, making quick or more precise adjustments possible — whereas before the movement was a single speed.

DJI has also added two new buttons under the screen, which are only visible when the display is flipped horizontal, but which provide shortcuts to useful regularly used controls, including the 2x lossless zoom.

The gimbal arm has been fitted with a magnetic surface and electronic contacts, which can be used to pair accessories, such as the new magnetic fill light included in the Creator Combo kit (see below).

On connection, the light automatically fires up because it's powered by the camera. Its output is minimal, and of no real help in bright daylight, but it's certainly useful in dimly lit spaces or at night.

Otherwise, the design is mostly as you were. The gimbal is supremely effective for smooth video on the move, the rear screen still rotates 90 degrees to switch between horizontal and vertical recording, and there's still a micro SD card slot (now with a protective cover) and USB-C charging.

There are other additions regarding memory and power, which I'll get onto next.

• Design score: 4.5/5

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: Performance

• Improved subject tracking
• 107GB of built-in memory added
• Higher-capacity battery extends record times

Despite it effectively being the same size as the Pocket 3 (just a fraction taller), there's a higher-capacity 1,545mAh battery squeezed into the Pocket 4 — that’s 20% more power compared to the older 1,300mAh unit.

This new battery provides up to four hours shooting time, but the small print stipulates that this for recording 1080p video at 24fps, and with wireless connections and the screen turned off. If you're recording 4K video, expect shooting times to be significantly less.

Still, that's quite the feat for such a tiny camera, plus charge times have been reduced, so you can be ready to shoot again quicker. From flat, the Pocket 4's battery can get to 100% charge in 32 minutes, or an 80% charge in just 18 minutes. Again, the small print says those numbers are for using DJI's 65W PD charger (sold separately, or included in the Creator Combo kit). I don't have the numbers for regular USB-C charging.

In addition to microSD card memory (compatible with cards up to 1TB), DJI has fitted the Pocket 4 with 107GB of built-in storage. which is sufficient for many hours of 4K video files, while the Pocket 3 has none. Both can record onto microSD.

There’s next-gen Wi-Fi 6 and USB 3.1 support in the Pocket 4 too, plus faster wired transfer speeds, making for a speedier workflow on the move.

Subject tracking has seen a boost in performance, with an upgrade to DJI's latest Active Track 7.0 (the Pocket 3 uses Active Track 6.0). A double tap on your subject in the frame initiates tracking, with the ability to track people, animals, vehicles and more.

DJI has let subject tracking loose in that it's available in more shooting modes. It's one of many instances where the Pocket 4 feels like a more polished all-rounder than the Pocket 3, which has many similar features but is hampered by what feel like unnecessary restrictions on which shooting modes you can use them in.

One drawback that does remain, however, is that the Pocket 4 can get a little warm when using its more power-hungry features. I've not had any overheating issues, but you're aware of the camera warming up when you're holding it.

• Performance score: 5/5

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: Image and video quality

• 1-inch sensor and single camera with 4K video up to 240fps
• New color profiles added, including D-Log and filmic looks
• Low-light further boosts the improved 14 stops dynamic range

For most people, the outright image quality of the Pocket 4, while impressive for pro vloggers, won't be enough reason to upgrade from the Pocket 3, which was already impressive in this regard. Both cameras are fitted with a 1-inch sensor, but DJI says the Pocket 4's 4K video output is optimized with 14 stops of dynamic range and 10-bit color depth.

One factor contributing to improved tones is the addition of a D Log color profile, which is available in the Pro setting. It's DJI's best flat color profile (also found in the pricey Mavic 4 Pro drone) which gives greater editing scope for color graders. The Pocket 3 offers D Log-M, which is a bit like a light version of D Log.

DJI says that the Low Light mode further boosts dynamic range and overall image quality from its previous Pocket. I haven't directly compared the two, but from the recordings I've made with the Pocket 4, detail in dark scenes looks a little cleaner than I remember.

There are also six new film tones to choose from for stylized baked-in looks, handy for users who would rather not mess around with Log and color grading. I've happily used a couple of these profiles regularly – 'Movie' is nice and punchy.

Slow-motion recording receives a boost, in that the Pocket 4 can shoot up to 240fps — that’s 8x slow-mo — in 4K and 1080p. The Pocket 3 is limited to 120fps for 4K, but can also shoot at 240fps in 1080p.

For stills photography, a SuperPhoto mode ups resolution from 9.4 megapixels to 37 megapixels, for more detailed snaps. That's for 1:1 aspect ratio pics, the resolution drops to 33 megapixels when switching to 16:9.

Even in stills mode, the Pocket 4 is clearly a video-focused camera, in that it doesn't offer 3:2 and 4:3 aspect ratio stills common among photographers.

The 2x lossless zoom is easily selected by pressing the left of the two new buttons under the Pocket 4's display, and again DJI has loosened previous restrictions for this feature — it can now be used in photo mode and when subject tracking is active.

Yes, image quality upgrades are minor in the Pocket 4, but for professional users there's just about enough to merit swapping out their Pocket 3.

• Image and video quality score: 4.5/5

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: testing scorecard

Should I buy the DJI Osmo Pocket 4?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: also consider

How I tested the DJI Osmo Pocket 4

• DJI loaned me the Creator Combo kit a few weeks before the product's launch
• I regularly used the Pocket 4 and all of its accessories
• I've tested its new features, including 240fps slow-mo recording

DJI loaned me an Osmo Pocket 4 Creator Combo kit, which comprises the camera, gimbal guard, magnetic fill light, grip handle, battery handle, mini tripod and DJI Mic 3 transmitter. I used all of these accessories throughout my review period ahead of the product launch, which spanned the best part of a month.

I briefly compared how the Pocket 4 differs to the Pocket 3 by holding both products side by side, though I haven't shot like-for-like videos with the two cameras to compare quality.

I've shot video in all resolutions and frame rates — that's 4K and 1080p up to 240fps — utilized subject tracking, and shot comparison clips using the various color profiles, including D-Log and the six presets, and used the SuperPhoto and regular photo modes in RAW and JPEG format.

I've recorded onto the camera's internal memory, and run the camera battery down and checked recharge times using a standard USB-C cable.

• First reviewed: April 2026
• Read more about how we test

Panasonic Lumix ZS300 / TZ300: two-minute review

Eight years ago, and before my time as Cameras Editor, TechRadar called the Lumix ZS200 / TZ200 "the most advanced travel zoom camera" and gave it a near-perfect 4.5 / 5 rating in its review — and that discontinued model now has a surprise successor, the Lumix TZ300.

Like the 2018 original, the Lumix ZS300 / TZ300 packs a stabilized 24-360mm f/3.3-6.4 lens and large 1-inch sensor, shooting 20MP stills and 4K video — a tempting cocktail of quality and versatility, all in a truly pocketable body.

Despite the years, there's very little between the two cameras; in fact, I can tell you the key differences in a single sentence: the 2026 model gains USB-C charging, but loses a built-in viewfinder. That’s it.

It’s great to see the once-popular travel zoom compact readily available again — I thoroughly enjoyed reviewing the older model long before my TechRadar days — and it's now compliant with common charger EU laws thanks to its USB-C port, and ready to compete for a spot on my best compact cameras round-up. However, in a way the 2026 version is a pricier downgrade.

Will Panasonic's decision to strip the Lumix TZ300 back, without seemingly compensating with new features, come back to bite it?

The fact is, compact camera shipments are on the up again, and right now the Lumix TZ300 still has little competition, so Panasonic might just cash in anyway — I don’t think it needs to improve is flagship travel zoom compact to maximize sales, just make it available again, which is what it's done.

Removing the viewfinder no doubt cuts costs down (not that those savings are passed onto the consumer), and could be a reflection on how people tend to rely on screens more in 2026. For me, it doesn’t feel like a dealbreaker — the EVF in the original model wasn’t the best in any case.

What bothers me more is that the new version offfers no compensation — there’s just more plastic in place of where the viewfinder once was — and it feels dated in other areas. For example, in the absence of a viewfinder, I would have loved for Panasonic to install a tilt mechanism for the 3-inch rear display for easier viewing from awkward angles, but we again have a fixed screen.

Nor do we get Panasonic's latest features seen in other recent cameras, such as its improved autofocus and Real Time LUTs color profiles.

So what are we to make of the Lumix ZS300? There is seemingly enough of a compact camera resurgence to merit Panasonic bringing the range back to life, but not enough competition or consumer desire (or both) for Panasonic to feel it was worth producing a truly new and improved model — the quality was already there eight years ago to satisfy today’s demands.

The bottom line is that I’m happy to see the popular Lumix travel zoom return — I just wish for a little more camera.

Panasonic Lumix ZS300 / TZ300 specs

Panasonic Lumix ZS300 / TZ300: Price and availability

• Announced in March 2026 and available from the start of May
• Costs $899 / £869 / AU$1,599
• Available in black or gray

The Lumix ZS300 / TZ300 is expected to hit stores in May 2026 and cost $899 / £869 / AU$1,599. It comes in two varieties — the gray version that Panasonic sent to me for this review, and an all-black version.

That price pits the Lumix TZ300 against the likes of the Canon PowerShot V1, which is a vlogging camera with a bigger sensor, superb autofocus and modern video skills, but a narrower standard zoom range. Given how much new tech is in Canon’s compact, it feels like better value (and there's rumored to be a travel-zoom version on the way which could rain on the Lumix parade).

The same money could also get you a small beginner mirrorless camera with kit lens, such as the excellent Fujifilm X-M5. Overall, the Lumix TZ300 feels like okay value at best.

• Price score: 3/5

Panasonic Lumix ZS300 / TZ300: Design

• Small and compact, with a foldaway / extending lens
• Finally, USB-C charging
• No viewfinder, detail-rich fixed 3-inch touchscreen

I’ll cover the core specs of the Lumix TZ300 in this review, but most of what you need to know about the camera’s design and performance has already been covered in our Lumix TZ200 review.

The Lumix TZ300 is still a tidily packaged camera that slips easily into a pocket, with a reassuring weightiness — it feels like a quality piece of kit.

There are rubberized front and thumb grips for a firm hold, and every control is nicely dampened but also responsive, as is the 3-inch touchscreen.

The lens folds neatly away when the camera is powered off, and extends smoothly as you move through the zoom range, either using the ring around the lens or the touchscreen — it’ll depend on which shooting mode you’re using.

It’s easy enough to set the camera to auto and let it take care of the settings based on the scene you're photographing, but there are also enough manual controls to satisfy discerning photographers, including manual exposure and auto ISO with the ability to set a minimum shutter speed (my go-to setup with my professional camera).

A pop-up flash is squeezed into the body, and is a handy feature for party portraits and creative low-light photography, especially since it’s possible to manually adjust its strength and swap between first and second curtain flash sync (the point at which the flash fires during exposure).

I really appreciated how slick the touchscreen function felt, and the detailed 1.84m-dot display itself, but a pronounced bump serves to highlight how its fixed design could have easily been upgraded to tilt without increasing the camera’s footprint.

Although the original viewfinder wasn’t the best in terms of the viewing experience, it was positioned smartly at the top-left, and felt easy to bring to the eye. I did miss having the option in the new version of the camera.

As mentioned, with the viewfinder having been removed I would have liked to see a tilt-screen upgrade to further assist viewing in bright light and at awkward angles; as it is, there's just plastic where the viewfinder was on the previous model.

• Design score: 3.5/5

Panasonic Lumix ZS300 / TZ300: Performance

• Versatile 15x optical zoom and decent stabilization performance
• Decent photo quality, dated video specs
• On-the-go charging is handy for traveling

For such a versatile and small camera, the image quality from the Lumix ZS300 / TZ300 is surprisingly good. Naturally, you lose a little sharpness at the telephoto end of the zoom, but it’s still decent enough.

What you also lose as you zoom in is light sensitivity. That’s because the maximum aperture is reduced from f/3.3 at the 24mm wide-angle end to f/6.4 at the 360mm telephoto setting.

Long-exposure photography isn't well served — the minimum possible lens aperture is f/8, and there's no practical way to utilize an ND filter besides physically holding one in place in front of the lens.

Still, the 1-inch sensor knocks the socks off the much smaller one in Panasonic's other recent travel zoom compact, the Lumix ZS99 / TZ99, a camera that majors on versatility and value, less so on quality. For me, this new Lumix, like its predecessor, strikes the right balance between quality and versatility.

In addition to Panasonic’s usual color profiles, there are filter effects including cross process and toy camera. These effects have been around for years, and in an age of Real Time LUTS profile and flat LOG profiles for video recording, they feel a little dated.

And, if it wasn’t already obvious, none of Panasonic’s current Real Time LUTs or LOG profiles are present, which also means no access to customizable LUTs as you get with the Lumix S9 mirrorless camera.

There’s nothing new under the hood, which means we’re getting an old processor, limited continuous shooting speeds, and dated autofocus performance compared to other cameras at this price point.

The autofocus system did feel dated to me. Yes, subject tracking and face / eye detection was a thing back in 2018 and we still have it here, but Panasonic’s recent mirrorless cameras have much more responsive autofocus performance.

Is having similarly good autofocus too much to ask for in a compact camera? Maybe, but look at Canon, which has bestowed excellent autofocus features on its PowerShot V1.

There is a particularly versatile macro focusing mode, mind you. Close focusing is so effective, in fact, that you can effectively be touching your subject with the end of the lens and it’ll still be in sharp focus.

Battery life is decent enough without standing out. The 1,025mAh unit can capture up to 360 shots on a full charge according to its CIPA rating, which felt about right based on my use.

And on-the-go USB-C charging, a boon for traveling, is a big upgrade in the new Lumix TZ300 over its predecessor, which doesn’t offer it.

• Performance score: 3.5/5

Panasonic Lumix ZS300 / TZ300: testing scorecard

Should I buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS300 / TZ300?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

Also consider

How I tested the Panasonic Lumix ZS300 / TZ300

• I took the Lumix ZS300 / TZ300 traveling for a couple of weeks
• I tested all of its photo and video modes
• I checked battery life and USB-C charging

Panasonic loaned me a Lumix TZ300 for two weeks to complete my review. I was fortunate to be traveling in China during this period, and was therefore able to use it for the scenarios it’s designed for, taking video and photos of ancient towns, portraits, wide vistas and more.

I shot the same photo sequences spanning the zoom range of the lens, shoot photos in raw and JPEG format, and video in 4K and 1080p with the various frame rates.

For a lot of the test I was in changeable weather conditions at high altitudes. I kept track of battery life, counting how many photos I could take on a full charge, plus how long it took to recharge the camera.

• First reviewed April 2026

Lomography Lomo MC-A: two-minute review

New additions to the ranks of the best film cameras are a lot more common in 2026 than they were a few years ago, with offerings arriving from the likes of Kodak, Rollei and Pentax.

Into this increasingly competitive market steps the Lomography Lomo MC-A. With a sleek metal chassis, this compact film camera looks and feels like a premium product. It puts a reassuring amount of weight in your hands, and a welcome degree of control at your fingertips. This is no simple point-and-shoot — the Lomo MC-A is something much more sophisticated.

Let’s run through the basics. The Lomography Lomo MC-A is a compact analog camera that takes 35mm film. It sports a 32mm Minitar-II lens with a five-element construction and a maximum aperture of f/2.8, and offers control of key settings like aperture (running up to f/16) and shutter speed (1/500 sec to bulb). It can read DX coding, meaning it can automatically detect a loaded film’s ISO speed, and it also has a flash, an exposure compensation dial, and a multiple-exposure mode.

Also key to its appeal is the autofocus — something of a rarity on analog compacts. The Lomo MC-A uses a zone-based focusing system, with focal distance settings for 0.4m, 0.8m, 1.5m, 3m and infinity. You can select your zone manually, or make use of the LiDAR-based autofocus system, which will analyse the scene and judge the correct zone to use.

While it's not going to give you anywhere near the level of responsiveness and accuracy of the autofocus systems in new digital mirrorless cameras, this system still makes the MC-A a much more photographically versatile camera than a simple fixed-focus point-and-shoot, allowing you to home in on a specific subject in the frame for dynamic imagery.

In a world where cheap film cameras are not hard to come by, the $549 / £499 / AU$799 Lomo MC-A might sound like a bit of an ask. But it has the potential to give you much better images than a point-and-shoot like the $99 Kodak Snapic A1, or than the $60 point-and-shoot from the 1990s you found at a garage sale.

Of course, the flip-side of this is that it makes the camera a little trickier to get to grips with. With the ability to focus comes the ability to mis-focus; and with the ability to control exposure comes the potential for misjudging it.

However, I’ve spent a considerable amount of time with the Lomography MC-A, and in my opinion it’s the best new film camera you can buy. It’s more versatile than the cheap point-and-shoots, and provides better value for money than the overpriced half-frame Pentax 17.

It’s not without its quirks and issues, which we'll get into, but it consistently delivers great-looking imagery on beautiful 35mm film — and can you ask for much more than that? In my view, this is now the benchmark for new film cameras to meet.

Lomography Lomo MC-A: price and availability

As mentioned, the Lomography MC-A is priced at $549 / £499 / AU$799. That puts it about on a par with the Pentax 17, and given that it’s a better-made camera offering full-frame quality rather than half-frame, I think it offers better value for money.

You also get plenty in the box in addition to the camera itself: a glass UV filter, a lens cap, a protective fabric wrap, a leather hand strap, colored gel flash filters, a CR2 battery rechargeable via USB-C, a Splitzer lens attachment (for creating split-effect multiple exposures), a book of inspirational images, and a sticker sheet.

Lomography Lomo MC-A: design

• Sturdy metal build feels hefty and premium
• Viewfinder is a little cramped
• Top LCD is neat, but practically not that useful

Your first reaction to picking up the Lomo MC-A will likely be to marvel at its heft. It's not a heavy camera in the grand scheme of things — you can use it one-handed without issue — but at 332g its metal-based build is substantially weightier than most modern point-and-shoots (which tend to be nothing but plastic). While I wouldn't risk dropping it, the MC-A feels reasonably tough, and I don't worry about it when it's in my bag — the supplied fabric wrap is also a help here.

Film-loading is simple — once the roll is secured in place, you simply make sure the leader is sitting with the perforations aligned to the teeth, and then close the back and you’re ready to go. The first time you load it, you might be a little dubious as to whether the film has actually taken, but the camera will warn you if it hasn't — and you can triple-check by winding on one frame and checking whether the rewind crank on the camera's base rotates as you do so.

The top LCD screen provides a counter of how many shots you’ve spent, as well as flash setting, focus setting and battery level. When you half-depress the shutter button the screen switches to displaying exposure information, though you’ll likely rarely see this, since when you half-depress the shutter button you’re almost certainly looking through the viewfinder.

The optical viewfinder does the job, but personally I find it quite small and cramped. A bigger viewfinder — maybe even one big enough for a readout of exposure information — would go a long way towards making composition feel more comfortable. There are two in-viewfinder LEDs, a blue one to let you know focus is locked, and an orange one to warn you if you’re getting a slow shutter speed that will likely cause image blur.

I find these lights a bit distracting and oblique, especially when the real-estate of the viewfinder is so small to begin with. A bigger viewfinder with room to display the exposure information displayed on the top LCD screen would have made much more sense to me.

Winding on film is done manually, via the delightfully retro-felling mechanical lever that springs back with a satisfying snap. The lever itself has quite a lot of travel, and you want to make sure you pull it all the way to the end with every frame – some users have reported a little bleed between frames, likely caused by the lever not being quite cranked far enough and the camera allowing the exposure anyway. In all my time with the MC-A, this only happened to me once, but it's worth being aware of.

Control of exposure is achieved via the dials on the top plate and the tiny aperture ring around the lens, which pops out from the front very slightly when the camera is activated. Settings can be dialed in manually or set to automated program mode, and in most situations, the camera will judge well enough that you can use the latter.

The tiny lens comes with an absolutely darling little lens cap. This is, I am embarrassed to report, incredibly easy to accidentally leave on — and the Lomo MC-A lacks a handy feature like the Pentax 17's ability to detect when the cap is on and refuse to capture an image until it's removed. If you're going to be taking the camera in and out of your pocket all day to capture little moments, I'd consider using the supplied clear UV filter as a lens protector instead. Just... trust me.

Overall though, the Lomo MC-A is a nicely designed object. Its premium metal build puts a reassuring weight in your hands, and the satisfying snap of the wind-on lever never gets old.

Lomography Lomo MC-A: performance

• Autofocus works well once you're used to it
• Lens is nicely sharp, though has a vignette
• Exposure metering is solid

Ultimately, the image is the important thing, and I really liked a lot of the images I got back from the Lomo MC-A. The 5-zone autofocus system allows for the creation of much more dynamic and varied images than are possible with a fixed-focus compact.

You have to maintain some distance, as the camera isn’t one for close-focusing; the minimum claimed distance is 0.4m, but I would give it even more latitude than that. In general, it will probably take running a roll to get used to the ins and outs of the autofocus. Your first scans will likely have a fair few blurry misfires, until you get in the habit of slowing down, taking a breath, and waiting for that blue LED to turn solid before firing the shutter.

Once you get the hang of it though, you can capture images with a sharp main subject and a nicely defocused background, and even moving subjects as long as they're not too speedy. A striding pedestrian is perfectly possible to capture in a sharp image, but a speeding bike is a bit more of an ask.

Images offer a good level of detail. The 32mm lens allows you to fit plenty in the frame, without being so wide that the perspective becomes distorted and non-naturalistic, and its quality is sufficient to hold up to a bit of cropping if you want to hone in on your subject in editing.

There is a pronounced vignette to the lens, noticeable when you capture an image with a lot of empty space, like a big blue sky. It can also flare a little when shot into direct light, producing pronounced optical effects. I don’t mind these quirks, personally — I think they rather add to the low-fi feel. But if you’re looking for optical flawlessness, it ain’t here.

If I'm adding to my wishlist for the next MC-A, or future accessories for this one, a teleconverter for the lens could be an interesting way to expand its versatility.

Realistically, you probably won't want to manually dial in your aperture and shutter speed for every single shot — and the good news here is that the Lomo MC-A's auto exposure modes generally do a commendable job.

I shot the majority of my test images using Aperture Priority mode – setting the aperture myself, and letting the camera handle shutter speeds. Exposures came back mostly well-balanced; I did notice a mild bias towards overexposure, particularly when the sun was out in full force, so you may want to consider dialing back half a stop using the exposure compensation dial if you think an image might run the risk of heavy glare.

Naturally, the look of your images is going to be predominantly dictated by the film you load. On my recent outings with the Lomo MC-A, I ran through some Kodak Gold 200, Kodak ColorPlus 200 and Lomography's own Lomo 400, the results of which you can see on this page.

I had the shots professionally developed, with scans at a resolution of 3130 x 2075, producing file sizes of around 5-7MB. I think the MC-A's lens is sharp enough that you could scan at higher resolutions than this.

Should I buy the Lomography Lomo MC-A?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

How I tested the Lomography Lomo MC-A

• I received a loan unit of the Lomography MC-A for testing, though I've since purchased one for myself.
• I’ve run a total of five rolls of 35mm color film through the camera over about three months.
• I’ve shot in variable light conditions and have taken the camera to a number of locations, mostly around London.

I’ve now rattled through five rolls of film with the Lomography MC-A, making for a total of around 180 frames. I’ve tried my hand at street photography with it to test the autofocus system, have shot landscape-style images from landmarks like London’s Primrose Hill, and have used both the auto and manual focusing and exposure modes. I’ve made it my main driver for several days out, as well as taking it on dedicated photo walks.

First reviewed March 2026

DJI Avata 360: one-minute review

Antigravity launched the world's first 360 camera drone in 2025, but now drone market-leader DJI has arrived with its own spin on the concept – and it's a quite different beast from the somewhat pedestrian Antigravity A1.

The clue's in the name: the DJI Avata 360 is not only a 360 drone but also an Avata drone — the latest model in DJI's line of sporty FPV flyers. If the A1 is a Fiat 500 (tiny, eye-catching, innovative, but not especially nippy), the Avata 360 is a VW Golf GTI – unassuming at first glance and much heavier, but faster, more responsive and more practical, yet (and here's where my automobile analogy breaks down) somehow cheaper too.

The Avata 360 looks a lot like the DJI Avata 2, or perhaps a larger DJI Neo 2, albeit with one obvious difference: its front-mounted camera has two lenses rather than one. Arranged on opposite faces of the gimbal, these record everything surrounding the drone (while using software to seamlessly unify the footage and remove any trace of the drone itself), allowing the user to re-frame footage in post-production using DJI's mobile or desktop apps.

I'll get more into how the 360 editing works in the full review below, but for now I'll just say that anyone who's used 360 cameras in the past will have little trouble creating some very impressive clips with this aerial version.

Where the Avata 360 differs from (and beats, in my view) the A1 is that, firstly, it offers a choice to fly it using a traditional twin-stick controller or the goggles-and-motion-controller FPV method. The A1 only supports the latter, and that means I need to bring a buddy along to act as spotter every time I fly it. If I'm on my own, I can't use the A1 at all (not legally, anyway), whereas I have the option to fly the Avata 360 using a RC 2 controller — no spotter required.

And in FPV mode I simply found the Avata 360 more enjoyable to fly than the A1: the design means it's faster, more agile and more responsive, even in high coastal winds, and switching it to single-camera mode (which uses one front-facing camera instead of the 360 setup, and records 4K 60fps footage) almost transforms it into an Avata 2.

Overall, the DJI Avata 360 feels like a more well-rounded (no pun intended) and flexible 360 drone than the A1, and at a more affordable price to boot.

DJI Avata 360: price and release date

• Launched on March 26 2026
• Significantly cheaper than the Antigravity A1 360 drone
• Available in four kits, including two Fly More Combos

DJI launched the Avata 360 on March 26 2026, with four different packages available. If you already own some form of compatible controller, you can buy the drone and a single battery for just £409 / AU$799. Packaged with DJI's excellent RC 2 touchscreen and twin-stick controller, it's £639 / AU$1,159.

Note: I haven't included US dollar pricing here, and you may have guessed the reason; DJI's troubles in the US are well documented elsewhere on TechRadar. Suffice to say this drone will not be officially launching in the States, which is a great shame.

There are also two Fly More Combo bundles, both priced at £829 / AU$1,619, each of which includes a nice bunch of extras. Both include the drone, three batteries, a charging cradle (able to recharge all three batteries simultaneously, with support for 100W and 65W fast charging), a set of spare propellers, a folding take-off and landing pad (very useful when launching from tricky terrain or long grass, and something I've not seen included in a Fly More Combo before), and a sturdy, sectioned sling bag to keep everything in. But one of the Fly More Combos includes the RC 2 controller, and the other the DJI Goggles N3 and RC Motion 3. So you're immediately set up for either standard or FPV flight.

This is a really affordable drone, especially when compared to the competition. Even with recent discounts, the Antigravity A1 Standard Combo (which includes the drone plus Vision goggles, a Grip controller, drone carry case and an extra set of propellers) costs over £1,000.

• Price score: 5/5

DJI Avata 360: specs

DJI Avata 360: Design and build quality

• Flat, non-folding design
• Labelled UK1 / C1 class, weighing around 455g
• Choice between RC 2 or Goggles/RC Motion 3 control

Rather than a folding design, DJI has opted for the same flat quadcopter shape it's recently used for the Avata 2, Neo and Neo 2. This means it's ready to go in moments (just pull off the included camera cover, if you're using it, and double tap the power button) and also that there are built-in prop guards to help protect the propellers from damage during collisions.

The Avata 360 isn't a super-lightweight drone; DJI claims it's around 455g, but my digital scales showed it to weigh 469g – well over the old sub-250g legal sweet spot. However, thanks to recent changes to UK law, this is no longer the issue it once was. This is the first drone I've seen that's labelled 'UK1' class, meaning that under new CAA guidelines it can be flown over uninvolved people (but not crowds) and closer than 50m to people horizontally. It can also be flown in residential, recreational, commercial and industrial areas. So, that's a good thing – it means I didn't have to venture to the middle of nowhere to test it properly.

It also means DJI hasn't had to make build-quality compromises to hit that magical sub-250g weight. The Avata 360 feels solid, sturdy, and likely to survive minor collisions without catastrophic damage, which isn't something I would say about the dainty, sub-250g Antigravity A1.

With no extended landing gear or feet, the drone doesn't have much clearance from the ground when landing or taking off, so it's important to launch and land on a flat, even surface in order to avoid potential damage. I found the folding orange landing pad including with the Fly More Combos very useful during testing, as landing even on short grass could cause issues.

The Avata 360 has a USB-C port on its side for file transfer and direct recharging, alongside a microSD slot for adding extra storage. That's optional, though, because there's a reasonable 42GB of internal storage built-in. Batteries slot straight into the back and come with the customary four-LED indicator to provide at-a-glance info on remaining power.

Control-wise, you have the choice between using a standard stick controller or a set of FPV goggles and a motion controller. In testing, I used the DJI RC 2 (it's also compatible with the RC-N2 and RC-N3, according to DJI) as my standard controller, and the DJI Goggles N3 paired with a DJI RC Motion 3 (you could also use the Goggles 3 or FPV Remote Controller 3) as my FPV setup, and found both to be excellent – they're sturdily built and comfortable to use. The Goggles N3 don't have a fancy exterior display like Antigravity's do, but on the plus side I can wear them with my glasses on, which I couldn't do on the Antigravity Goggles.

Finally, DJI has designed the Avata 360's camera lenses to be user-replaceable, should they get scratched, during flight or otherwise. The lenses do protrude a little, which does make them more susceptible to contact than most drone cameras, so this feels like a good move from the company.

• Design score: 5/5

DJI Avata 360: Features and flight performance

• Omnidirectional vision system with front-facing LiDAR and down-facing infrared sensors
• 18m/s maximum speed and Level 5 wind resistance
• Up to 22 minutes of flight time per battery

Like most DJI drones, the Avata 360 is an assured and safety-conscious flyer. It comes with full omnidirectional obstacle avoidance, using a combination of vision, LiDAR and infrared sensors to spot hazards in all directions, plus a reliable return-to-home mode and respectable battery life of up to 22 minutes' flight time (I would put the real-world use closer to 15 minutes, based on my testing, but much will depend on environmental factors – your mileage may vary, as they say).

In the air, it's a nimbler and nippier drone than the Antigravity A1. I found it performed very responsively even in windy conditions, and in Sport Mode (which disables the safety sensors), it's capable of hitting speeds of up to 18m/s (around 40mph). The low-latency O4+ video transmission system is remarkably stable, which helps keep the drone under control at all times. While testing, I never experienced a single loss of signal or even a noticeable reduction in the live-view quality.

As mentioned, at launch there are two ways to fly the Avata 360: using a standard twin-stick controller or with an FPV headset and motion controller. I love the fact that DJI has given buyers a choice — which for me is one of the main advantages this drone has over its competitor the Antigravity A1, which only offers goggles- and motion controller-based flight. With the Avata 360, a twin-stick controller is perfect for solo trips, as it doesn't require a spotter and the controls are identical to those of standard camera drones like the DJI Mini 5 Pro or Air 3S. It's easy to pick up and fly immediately, with no need to master the intricacies of motion controllers or strap on a set of goggles.

• Flight performance score: 5/5

DJI Avata 360: Image and video quality

• Paired 1/1.1-inch sensors offer up to 8K 60fps videos and 120MP photos
• Single-camera mode also available for traditional FPV video capture
• 10-bit video and flat D-log M color profile supported

The Avata 360 is equipped with two 1/1.1-inch sensors paired with ultra-wide lenses, which work in tandem to capture everything around it in up to 8K resolution at 60fps. That beats the Antigravity on specs alone (it captures 8K, but only up to 30fps), but the larger sensor size and higher bitrate also make the general image quality higher.

With support for 10-bit video and the flat D-log M color profile, this means the Avata 360 offers excellent video for a 360 drone. It won't trouble the DJI Air 3S or DJI Mavic 4 Pro when it comes to real pro-quality aerial footage, but the Avata 360 can really hold its own in terms of detail and dynamic range.

Once you've captured your 360 footage, it can be reframed using one of DJI's apps. I edited videos on both the DJI Fly mobile app and the DJI Studio desktop app, and both work well and in much the same way. You can choose your desired viewpoint, then save it as a keyframe, and the app will automatically, and smoothly, transition from one keyframe to the next. You can then export the video, with 8K 360 recording resulting in final videos of up to 4K resolution.

For those who don't want to reframe, there's single-lens mode. This records 4K 60fps footage using only a single forward-facing lens, which is delivered as a standard 'flat' video that can't be reframed after the fact. It's akin to recording a video on any of DJI's other camera drones, really — what you see is what you get.

It's also possible to snap 120MP panoramic 360 photos, which can then be edited into short videos or cropped and reframed much like a 360 video. I personally rarely felt the need to take a still shot while reviewing, as video is where the Avata 360 really shines in my opinion, but the feature is there should you need it.

Overall, I'm highly impressed by the Avata 360's camera performance. The base quality is higher than that of its only true rival, the Antigravity A1, and its 360 editing is just as good.

• Image and video quality score: 5/5

DJI Avata 360: testing scorecard

Should I buy the DJI Avata 360?

Buy it if...

Don't buy it if...

DJI Avata 360: also consider

How I tested the DJI Avata 360

• All flight modes and control methods tested
• Photos and videos captured
• Tracking and safety features tested

DJI sent me an Avata 360 a couple of weeks before its official launch, along with an RC 2 controller, an RC Motion 3 grip controller and a Goggles N3 headset. That meant I had the time to fly it in a range of locations and using both a traditional controller and an FPV setup. I did test the drone in some windy conditions at times, but in general flew it in fine weather and good light — aside from the very foggy day you see in one of the sample videos above.

I flew in every available flight mode for both twin-stick and FPV motion flying, tested the drone's subject-tracking capabilities and how capable it was of detecting and avoiding obstacles.

Once I had recorded footage and captured still photos, I later transferred it from the drone's internal storage to my iPhone and computer for editing and reframing, for which I used the DJI Mimo and DJI Studio apps. I also exported reframed footage from DJI Studio to further tweak in DaVinci Resolve Studio, resulting in the sample videos and photos you see above.

• First reviewed: March 2026
• Read more about how we test