Editorial work once brought in 75% of one photographer's income. Today it accounts for about 5%, and the shift wasn't forced on him by failure. 

[Read More]

Abandoned slate quarries hold more than dramatic scenery. Some hide names carved into stone over a century ago, tools left where workers dropped them, and connections to people you'd never expect. 

[Read More]

Twenty years behind a camera can lock you into fixed ideas about what gear delivers the results you want. A long-held bias against Micro Four Thirds is exactly what gets challenged here, and the reasons have less to do with specs than with how you actually shoot. 

[Read More]

Three days, two nights, and a mattress thrown in the back of a car with no sheets on it. That's the entire kit behind a photography trip along the northern coast of Spain, where the real work turns out to be finding angles that cooperate. 

[Read More]

You may have noticed that photography lenses are marked in f-numbers, f/1.4, f/2.8, f/8, while cinema lenses are marked in T-numbers, T1.5, T2.9, and wondered whether they mean the same thing. They are closely related, they sit in the same spots on the aperture ring, and a T-number looks just like an f-number with a different letter in front. But they measure two genuinely different things, and the gap between them tells you something real about how lenses work and why a cinematographer cares about it while a portrait photographer mostly does not. 

[Read More]

There is a peculiar cult operating inside photography. You have seen them: the Autofocus Clergy.

The laboratory monks of corner sharpness and focus-acquisition speed. Men refreshing firmware notes with the anticipation of Renaissance astronomers awaiting celestial revelation. They speak of subject detection as if divine intervention had finally solved photography's ancient tragedy: the terrifying possibility of missing something.

[Read More]